There was a time when the very first step of any writing process of mine was to open up the word processor and just start with page one. This is a good way to start for some people. I certainly liked the immediacy of it. It’s hugely rewarding to turn a blank page into one with writing on it very quickly. However, for me at least, repetition of this leads to a very large number of very small word files with the first pages of unfinished work.
For something short, this works great, but anything of any length, I need an outline.
So now step one on when an idea comes bounding into my head like a prancing buck, is to open up a wiki on the subject. This isn’t a public wiki, like the one for the Sam Young Chronicles, but essentially just a big note book for me me to scribble stuff out on. In the past, I would’ve gone to a service like wikispaces for something like this. Lately, in accordance with Google’s slow progression in taking over my life, I go to Google Sites.
At this point, the process is simple: I copy over a template wiki I’ve built previously, one with some basic page categories*, and start world building. If I’m working within a universe that I’ve already built out, this isn’t such a big step. Currently I’m working on a fresh world, so I’ve got a blank slate.
After an afternoon of page creation I’ve got maybe two dozen blank pages, placeholders as a reminder to fill in details later, and less then half a dozen with rough character or idea treatments. Articles at this stage aren’t of the same quality you might see in a public wiki, meant to inform someone fresh about a subject. Instead, there is just enough of a framework for me to come back later and remember what exactly I had in mind.
Step two might vary. If I feel like I have a good handle on the ‘voice’ of the work, I’ll move straight into outlining the plot. If not, I’ll put a couple of pages down to nail out how the narrator sounds in my head. The tone of the work will depend a lot on this. A more involved or whimsical narrator will effect how far I go in the plot, and decisions like first person versus third person and who are out POV characters, can emerge here.
Very soon though, I reach the brick wall of needing an outline. This is the case now, of course, so I’m off to work and we’ll meet again in Part 2.
* Characters, Concepts, Organizations, etc.
Mistborn
I just finished the Misborn series by Brandon Sanderson. It had been on my reading list for a little while now, as I always enjoy Brandon’s ideas and comments on the Writing Excuses podcast. But it was my best friend reading them and giving me the “you HAVE to read this now now now now now” act that got me to bump them to the top of my list. He was right.
Sanderson’s writing is great. Not the actual language of it, of course. If there is poetry in the words, they didn’t translate in to the reading on the audiobook*. If I recall, there was at least once or twice where some word choice drew an actual grown from me.** I’ve written far worse, of course, and the point is not to read Sanderson’s text for liquid prose. You read it because Sanderson is smart and because he’s thought the content out so thoroughly.
I ended the first book thinking that his world was pretty cool and the plot was fun, but that the most impressive idea he’d included was the magical system described. Allomancy is a very concrete system, just this side of a fictional science as compared to the soft magical systems in other fantasy. It’s a really good idea, and seeing how Sanderson has constructed it has made me rethink how I approach magic in my own works.
By the end of the third book, though, the intricately detailed magical systems are probably the least interesting thing going on in the story. All that stuff you thought was just fluff from the first half of the trilogy? It’s basically all a series of Chekhovs guns***. As I’m not fearful of spoilers, I had some idea of what was going to happen at the end of the series and Sanderson was building little things into big things for the entire series, something few series writer’s match. I am impressed.
I’ve read quite a lot of the annotations for the books and it’s useful. I wish more authors would post this sort of commentary on their work, as it lets you see a lot of the thought process behind the finished work. That is very useful for someone trying to learn from it.
*My preferred way to ingest books these days.
** A particular use of two forms of the word distance in the same sentence comes to mind.
*** Chekhov’s armory, if you will.